Understanding long sentences
Here is an example of the problem we want to help you solve:
The present, left-wing, national government, elected last year with a small majority, has recently bravely proposed new and innovative legislation stopping people hiding undeclared money in overseas accounts to avoid tax and it is clear that such legislation will encounter significant opposition from some financial quarters as well as from the banks.
That sentence is 52 words long and it is not unusual to find even longer sentences, especially in technical or scientific texts. This lesson is designed to help you understand the meaning quickly and ignore what you do not need to know. This is called unpacking the meaning. Think of the sentence like a train: it's all joined together but each part carries different meanings.
Unpacking the meaning |
We will use the example above to help you find out what you need
to know and unpack that meaning only.
Here's how to do it.
Strategy 1:Find the phrases and Head words |
Most positive sentences in English follow a structure you know well:
SUBJECT + VERB (+ OBJECT)
As you know, not all verbs take an object so that part is (in brackets).
Task 1:
Here are two simpler examples for you to practise with
before we get to the sentence above.
|
|
Identify the phrases of both sentences which
do different things and write them down. Then identify the key word in each phrase. Click here when you have done that. |
- Sentence 1
- My old dog: this is the subject noun phrase and the most important word is dog. That is called the Head of the phrase.
- still enjoys: this is the verb phrase and the key word (the Head) is enjoys.
- his long weekend walk in the country: a longer object noun phrase with the Head walk.
- Sentence 2
- The young man: this is the subject noun phrase and the Head is man.
- genuinely believed: the verb phrase with the Head believed.
- Mary's mad ideas about life on Mars: this noun phrase is the object of the verb and has the Head ideas.
Identifying the Head of each phrase means that you can now take out all the unnecessary information and get to:
- Dog enjoys walk
- Man believed ideas
and that will tell you what you really need to know.
Task 2:
That was quite easy. Now try this sentence. The crepuscular illumination seriously constrained his ability to discern the hieroglyphs. |
|
Identify the phrases in this sentence which do different
things and write them down. Then identify the Head words of each phrase. Click here when you have done that. |
The
three phrases are:
The crepuscular illumination
seriously constrained
his ability to discern the hieroglyphs
The
key (Head) words are:
illumination (a noun and the subject)
constrained (the verb)
ability (another noun and the object of the verb)
If you want to know, crepuscular describes the light at the
end of the day, illumination is light, constrained
means restrict or make difficult, discern means be able to
read or see and hieroglyphs are ancient Egyptian writing
characters. All together the sentence means
The dim light made reading difficult.
You do not need to know that to be able to recognise what
each part of the sentence is doing.
Task 3:
Look again at the first problem sentence. Identify the phrases. Identify the key nouns and verbs (the Heads) of the phrases. Write them down. |
|
Here is the sentence again: |
The present, left-wing, national government, elected last year with a small majority, has recently bravely proposed new and innovative legislation stopping people hiding undeclared money in overseas accounts to avoid tax and it is clear that such legislation will encounter significant opposition from some financial quarters as well as from the banks.
Click here when you have done that.You should have something like this:
- The present, left-wing, national government, elected last year with a small majority: the 1st subject noun phrase with government as the Head word
- has recently bravely proposed: the verb phrase with the Head proposed
- new and innovative legislation stopping people hiding undeclared money in overseas accounts to avoid tax: a noun phrase with the Head legislation and the object of the verb
- it is clear that such legislation: This is a new subject noun phrase. Notice that this part is joined to the first part with and. That means it could stand alone as a separate sentence.
- will encounter: the verb phrase of the second part with the Head encounter
- significant opposition from some financial quarters as well as from the banks: the noun phrase, with the Head opposition, which is the object of the verb encounter
Now it is possible to reduce the
sentence to the really important information, ignoring
everything else:
The government proposed
legislation. The legislation will encounter opposition.
That's really all you need to
understand what you are reading.
Strategy 2:Understanding modification |
So, now that we have the main meaning of the sentence we can look
at what all the other words and phrases are doing. Often, you don't
need to do this because you have already understood the key ideas
and can move on. Sometimes, this is important because we want
to understand as much as possible.
To do this, we need to look at what comes before the Head and what
follows it separately.
- What comes in front of the Head is a pre-modifier
- What comes after the Head is a post-modifier
in front of the Head |
We can take each phrase in turn. Here's the sentence again:
The present, left-wing, national government, elected last year with a small majority, has recently bravely proposed new and innovative legislation stopping people hiding undeclared money in overseas accounts to avoid tax and it is clear that such legislation will encounter significant opposition from some financial quarters as well as from the banks.
Task 4: Look at the parts of the phrases in black and decode what they are doing. When you are sure, click on the to see if we agree. |
The present, left-wing, national
government |
These look like adjectives but, in fact, they are more
important. They are classifiers
because they don't tell you about the
noun, they tell you what kind of noun
it is.
They are important for that reason. If you want to know what kind of noun it is, you need to understand these words. For example: the noun friend is a simple one and you can have, for example, a loyal friend (that's a simple adjective describing the friend) but we can also have a school friend and school is a classifier which changes the type of noun we have. |
has recently bravely
proposed |
Here we have two types of word in front of the verb:
have is an auxiliary verb telling you the tense and is not difficult to understand if you know that the present perfect is used to talk about now. recently and bravely are adverbs telling you about the verb. It is often not necessary to know what adverbs mean. The meaning of recently is contained in the verb tense, in fact, and the adverb bravely just tells you what the writer thinks, not what the government thinks. |
new and innovative
legislation |
Here, we have two adjectives joined by and.
It is not important to understand them both because innovative includes the idea of new. Both these words are adjectives not classifiers so they are not so important. |
it is clear that such
legislation |
Here, the phrase ... it is
clear that ... only tells you about the
writer's attitude. You can safely ignore it if the
writer's opinion is not important to you.
You can also ignore other attitude markers such as obviously, patently, blatantly, demonstrably etc. when you see them. |
will encounter |
No problem here. We are talking about a future
that the writer believes will happen.
|
significant opposition |
If you understand the word opposition, you do
not need to understand the adjective
significant.
It adds very little.
|
financial quarters |
Another classifier. As usual, it is important to
understand this word because the noun, quarters,
just means parts of society so we need the classifier to
tell us what the writer is saying.
|
The four guides: |
- Make sure you understand the Heads of each phrase
- Make sure you understand any classifiers
- Ignore markers of the writer's opinion
- Ignore adverbs and adjectives you don't know
after the Head |
Task 5:
We will follow the same system. Look at the parts of the phrases in black and decode what they are doing. When you are sure, click on the to see if we agree. |
government, elected last year with
a small majority, |
This a relative clause but the pronoun which is
not included. Notice that it comes between commas.
Any relative clause between commas is just extra
information. You can safely ignore it.
For example: the house which is painted blue is his This is a relative clause with no commas so it is important in some way that you identify the right house. the house, which is painted blue, is his This is a relative clause inside commas so you can ignore the extra information. |
legislation stopping people hiding
undeclared money in overseas accounts to avoid tax |
The verb stopping
can be replaced with which will stop so this is
information you do need. There
are no commas to show that it is just extra information.
Without understanding post-modifiers like this, you cannot get the full meaning. |
opposition
from some financial quarters as well as from the banks |
Here, we have two prepositional phrases.
Prepositional phrases are usually not too important because they add extra information. You decide if you need the information to get the meaning you want. For example, we can have: The man with white hair is his father You only need to understand with white hair if it is not clear in any other way. Usually, it is. |
The four guides: |
- Make sure you understand the Heads of each phrase
- Make sure you understand any relative clauses which are not between commas
- Ignore any relative clauses which are between commas
- Look carefully at prepositional phrases to see if they contain any information you need that is not stated in another part of the text
Split phrases |
Be careful to understand split modifying phrases. Here's an example:
- She went to see John in the morning
- In the morning, she went to see John
In both these sentences, the verb is went. In both
cases, we know that the action happened in the morning.
The verb is modified by the prepositional phrase in the morning.
This information is given at the end or at the beginning but it is
separated from the verb:
- in the morning comes at the end (separated from went by to see John).
- In the morning comes at the beginning and is separated from went by she.
The phrase in the morning clearly refers to the verb, not to John. It tells us when she went.
That is simple enough but it sometimes gets complicated. For example:
- We will have to check soon what the problem is by looking at the data in May.
Here, one of the modifiers for check is sent to the end of the sentence:
- soon: the adverb modifier follows the verb directly so is a simple post-modifying expression.
- in May is separated from the verb by soon what the problem is. The prepositional phrase, in May, refers to the verb, check, not the data. It tells us when we do the checking not when the data will be there.
The verbs phrase is check ... in May.
Sometimes it is not clear what is modifying what. For example, the sentence:
He explained the problem for the audience
Can mean:
- The audience had a problem (That means, He explained the problem that the audience had.)
- The problem was explained to the audience (That means, He explained the problem to the audience.)
Only the context will help you here.
The two guides: |
- Look out for split modifying phrases
- Make sure you understand what a prepositional phrase is really modifying – is it the noun or the verb?
Now it's time to take a test of all this. Click here when you are ready.