Prepositions of time
Before tackling this section, you should work through (or at least read) the guide to prepositions of place. Many of the concepts are analogous so this guide will not redefine some key ideas. It should be comprehensible, however, even if you don't do that.
How many prepositions of time are there? |
Fortunately, not as many as there are prepositions of place and many are common to both areas (often with similar functions). Here's an unclassified reference list of 33 of them:
about above after ago around at before between by close to due to |
during for from in near to next on outside over past prior to |
since through throughout till to towards under until up to with within |
What do time prepositions do? |
Time prepositions usually perform one of two functions:
- An adjunct as in We left the house at six o'clock
- A post-modifier as in a visitor from the future
Just as we discovered with prepositions of place, words which are
sometimes used as time prepositions can be found masquerading as
other parts of speech. So, for example, we get:
He waited
outside (adverb use)
vs.
He couldn't do the work outside four hours
(adjunct prepositional use)
or
The kitchen was tiled throughout
(adverb use)
vs.
He stayed throughout the concert (adjunct
prepositional use)
or
He missed the meeting
at six o'clock
(prepositional post-modification of meeting)
vs.
The bus
came at last (adverbial use)
or even
I'll come since you ask
(subordinating conjunction)
vs.
I have been here since June
(preposition).
We need to be alert, therefore, look beyond the form of the word and
decide what it is actually doing. For a little more, see the guide to
prepositions of place linked in the list of related guides at the end.
For your entertainment, this sliding between word class is sometimes
known as syntactic homonymy. That is not a term with which to
trouble most learners but it is a seriously important issue when
defining word class. Telling learners, for example, that
outside is always a preposition is misleading and will lead to
errors of overextension such as
*Please only smoke outside here.
How do we analyse prepositions of time? |
This is, also fortunately, somewhat simpler than analysing prepositions of place but there are a few surprises in store.
Dimensions |
Prepositions of place refer to three possible dimensions (point, line or surface and area or volume). Time, as any cosmologist will tell you, is much simpler and we are dealing with only two dimensions:
- A point in time (or an event perceived as a point in time)
- A period of time
It's actually quite simple to identify which prepositions do
which if you are a native or native-like speaker of English but
prepositions do not translate across languages neatly (when they
translate at all) and learners will encounter trouble remembering
which ones do which.
Which of the following refer to a point in time and which to a
period of time?
about, after, ago, at, before, by, during, for, from,
throughout, under, until
Click on the
to reveal the answers when you have answered that.
Point specific | Period specific | Both |
at before by from until |
ago during for through(out) under |
about after |
For example: | For example: | For example: |
He came at 6 I finished before dinner Finish it by nightfall She worked from dawn till dusk She worked until Sunday |
I arrived ten minutes ago He worked here during his holidays He lay on the beach for hours He slept through(out) my speech She stayed under a week |
She came about 10 and stayed about two hours He arrived after 11 and left after ten minutes |
Learners need to know what dimensions of time prepositions relate to or they will not easily be able to use them. Of course.
Two notes:
- during, for and since need careful
handling:
- during precedes an event that is understood to
be of some minimal duration so we can have
during the film
during his stay
but not usually
*during the second
*during the moment
etc.
This preposition does not precede a numerically stated period of time so we don't have
*during three years
*during two hours
etc. but we can have
during the 20th century
during his retirement
etc.
The word is always followed by a noun phrase.
The preposition throughout works similarly, by the way. - since refers back to a point in time or an
event in time, not specifically a
period of time. We can have, therefore:
He had lived there since the war
and
He had lived there since 1984
where both the event in time and the year are perceived as points in time.
The period of time It is also, in British English, nearly always used with a perfect aspect tense form. - for is the preposition of choice when setting
out a precise period of time:
for three years
for three minutes
for a nanosecond
etc.
The duration of the time is immaterial (compare during). - When used before time nouns such as the summer, the
month etc., both for and during can
be used:
She stayed during the summer
She stayed for the summer.
However, for implies throughout but during does not so the first example may suggest that she came for a short visit in the summer and the second implies she stayed for the whole summer.
- during precedes an event that is understood to
be of some minimal duration so we can have
- An event may be perceived as a point in time or taking a
long period of time so:
I finished before dinner
implies that the speaker sees the meal as a point in time (probably its beginning) but we can also have
He talked during dinner
where the meal is perceived as a long-duration event.
Unless otherwise stated, speakers usually refer to long events as points of time and mean the beginning or the end of the event:
He has been drinking since (the end of) lunch
He has lived here since (the end of) the war
She arrived before (the beginning of) the celebrations
They left after (the end of) the wedding
at, in, on |
We saw in the guide to prepositions of time that these prepositions work with three different dimensions. An analogous situation applies to time prepositions.
- at
- is mostly used for points in time as registered by clocks:
at 6
at the striking of the hour
at midnight
etc.
It is also used idiomatically for certain holiday seasons:
at Christmas
at Thanksgiving
at Eid
etc.
and in two common irregular expressions
at night
and
at the weekend.
US English, more logically, allows
on the weekend. - on
- is used for days (analogous with line or surface with
prepositions of place) so we get
on Thursday
on 1st June
on the preceding day
etc. - in
- precedes periods of time (analogous to the area or volume
concept with prepositions of place) so we get
in the summer
in the evening
in the 20th century
in his life, in 2010
in the years that followed
etc.
before, after, since, until/till |
The trick with these four is to note that they are also subordinating conjunctions carrying the same meanings. As far as meaning goes, there is, then, no serious problem but how they colligate (i.e., co-occur with certain structures) is worth some analysis.
before | after | since | until/till | |
as preposition | he was a clerk before the war | he arrived after 10 o'clock | I've been worried since seeing him leave the house | we'll wait until/till tomorrow |
as subordinating conjunction | he was a clerk before he joined the army | he arrived after the clock had struck 10 | I've been worried since it got dark | we'll wait until the time is right |
Notes:
- as prepositions these words are usually followed by
- a noun phrase (the war, last night)
a non-finite -ing clause with no subject (seeing him leave the house) - as subordination conjunctions the words are usually followed by
- a finite clause (it got dark, the time is right)
by
This preposition means up to that point in time and occurs most frequently with two constructions:
- A simple noun phrase or time phrase:
by the end
by midnight
by 6 o'clock
etc.) - A perfect aspect tense form:
by the time we had finished
by the time they have finished
etc.
other time prepositions |
Most other time prepositions can be understood by analogy to the same place prepositions. It is not a large conceptual leap from the items on the left to those on the right, for example:
Place | Time |
It's between the house and the garage | Come between 6 and 7 |
Walk up to the end of the street | I'll stay up to the end of the film |
It's inside the box | I finished inside two hours |
She's walking towards us | It's getting towards midnight |
He walked past the door | He worked past 6 |
He's in the next house | I'll see you next Monday |
He slept throughout my presentation | He slept throughout the day |
dropping the preposition |
Unlike place prepositions, which are very rarely omitted, time
prepositions are frequently elided. This is somewhat
complicated and uses are idiomatic.
In the following, there are two tasks:
- decide if the example sentences are acceptable and
- decide what the rule is.
Click on the to reveal some comments when you have done the two tasks.
Examples | Task 1: Acceptable? Yes / No | Task 2: and the rule is ... |
a) This year, we are staying at Margate b) In this year we are staying at Margate c) She works harder these days d) She works harder on these days e) I'll tell him next time we meet f) I'll tell him at the next time we meet |
a) Yes
b) No c) Yes d) No e) Yes f) No All the correct examples contain a deictic (or pointing term), this, these, next. Other examples are that, last, those. Rule 1: When we use deictic words, the preposition must be omitted. |
a) She had
written it the January before last b) She had written it in the January before last c) The parcel arrived the day before yesterday d) The parcel arrived on the day before yesterday e) We'll meet again on Monday week f) We'll meet again Monday week |
a) Yes
b) Yes c) Yes d) Yes e) Yes f) Yes These examples also contain deictic phrases (before, last, week) but the difference is that they refer to a time more than one remove from the present. Rule 2: Rule 1 is optional if the reference is to a time more than one remove from the present. (In AmE, the preposition is almost always omitted.) |
a) I saw
him yesterday b) I saw him on yesterday c) I'll go tomorrow d) I'll go on tomorrow e) She came yesterday evening f) She came in yesterday evening |
a) Yes
b) No c) Yes d) No e) Yes f) No Rule 3: If the time noun includes the meaning of last, next or this (yesterday, tomorrow, today), we must exclude the preposition. |
a) Some Sundays, he's in his garden b) On some Sundays he's in his garden c) Every summer she goes back to her mother's d) In every summer she goes back to her mother's e) He comes for dinner most evenings f) He comes for dinner in most evenings |
a) Yes
b) No c) Yes d) No e) Yes f) No Rule 4: If the time expression is quantified (with a determiner like every, some etc.), the preposition must be omitted. |
Hint: think
about formality here. a) We met the day of my graduation b) We met on the day of my graduation c) We lived in London three months d) We lived in London for three months e) Sundays, we play tennis f) On Sundays, we play tennis |
a) Yes
b) Yes c) Yes d) Yes e) Yes f) Yes Rule 5: This is a rule of thumb. When we can omit the preposition, doing so makes the sentence less formal. AmE does this more than BrE but there is a clear tendency for BrE to adopt the practice. |
Putting the analysis into practice in the classroom |
Explaining and exemplifying
Using this kind of analysis, it becomes a little easier to explain to a learner what a time preposition 'means'.
Example 1: if you were asked to explain during that week, throughout that week, for that week, since that week, what would you say? Click when you have decided.
The
first key distinction is clearly whether the preposition refers to
a point in time or a period of time.
Therefore, you cannot have:
*He has stayed during 6 o'clock
because that's a point in time and the word can only relate to
something thought of as a period of time
*She worked throughout 6
o'clock
because
that's a point in time and the word can only relate to a period of
time
You can have:
He has disliked him since that
week
because the week is perceived as a point in time (probably
by the end of that week)
She stayed for that week
because, like during and throughout, for
can refer to a period of time
The second key distinction is the length of the period.
for can be used for very short periods of time so
the following are allowable:
They thought for a moment
They thought for days
But the following are not:
*They thought during a moment
*They thought throughout a second
because during can only be used with an event of some
minimal duration (at least an hour, probably longer).
Finally, we need to make clear that it is the speaker's perception
of an event which determines whether it is treated as a period of
time or a point in time.
Getting learners to notice the difference between these is useful:
She has worked throughout
lunch
vs.
She has worked since
lunch
and
Peter fought in the war
vs.
Peter
fought during the war
vs.
Peter
fought throughout the war
The first treats the war as a point in time and says nothing about
the duration of the fighting. The second treats the war as a
long event but, again says nothing about how long he fought.
The third makes it clear that he fought continuously from the
beginning to the end.
Add in the sense of
Peter has not fought
since the war
and that should satisfy the most demanding of learners.
Example 2: if you were asked how at, on and in differ, how would you reply? Click when you have decided.
All three prepositions can be used for time but their functions are analogous to the uses for prepositions of place. Therefore, we can usefully revise the learners' knowledge of place prepositions and then extend it to prepositions of time. Like this
Place | Time |
Point: at the corner at the end of the road |
Point: at the last minute at 6 o'clock |
Surface or line: on the border on the table |
Time surrounding a point: on Sunday she got up at six on Tuesdays she often goes shopping at lunchtime |
Area or volume: in the box in the garden in the city |
Time surrounding other points or periods of
time: In the summer, we often have hot days In 1968 many important events occurred In the mornings I get a number of things done |
Unless you are feeling adventurous, now is probably not the time to introduce anomalies such as at night, at the weekend etc. Get the basics clear first.
Using graphics
Many people respond well to graphical representations of the
relationships set by time prepositions and they are easy to invent off
the cuff. The main issue, point vs. duration, can be
represented like this.
Here are some cut-out-and-keep
diagrams:
Prepositions and their relation to a point in time can be represented like this: |
or this: |
Related guides | |
time adjuncts | for an overview of how else we signal when something happened in English |
prepositions of place | for a similar guide to another set of prepositions |
prepositional phrases | for a guide to prepositions and their complements |
7 meanings of over | for a short video presentation of the meanings of a troublesome preposition |
elementary prepositions | for a lesson for elementary learners with a short video to help them understand place and movement |
Main reference:
Quirk, R, Greenbaum, S, Leech, G & Svartvik, J, 1972, A Grammar of
Contemporary English,
Harlow: Longman