Checking questions
You may like to follow the guide to asking good questions (new tab) before tackling this area but no assumption is made that you have done so in what follows.
There are two sorts of checking questions which all teachers need to use frequently:
- Instruction-checking questions (also known as ICQs)
These are asked to make sure that the learners know what they are supposed to be doing and to alert them to the key meaning(s) of the instruction. - Concept-checking questions (also known as CCQs)
These are asked for two reasons:- to lead the learner to understanding a concept (which may be how a tense is used, the meaning of a word or some of its other characteristics and so on).
- to help the teacher (and the learners) decide whether they have grasped a concept adequately before moving on or extending the learners' knowledge and skills.
Both sorts of questions are what are called display questions insofar as the questioner knows the answer and the person being asked knows that the questioner knows the answer.
We will take each type separately but note when there is some overlap.
Instruction-checking questions |
We ask instruction-setting questions for very simple reasons:
- because we do not want people wasting time not knowing what to do
- because we have designed an activity in a certain way that makes it useful and effective and that's the way it should be done
- because we want to spend our time helping, monitoring and supporting our learners, not wasting it repairing our instructions or repeating them
Simple Rule #1:
The more complicated the instruction is, the more carefully it needs to be checked.
If your instruction is, for example:
Please start now.
then is hardly needs checking because you can see whether or not
people are doing as you ask.
If, on the other hand, your instruction is:
Now work in pairs to match the 7 underlined words in the text to the 8 definitions at the bottom of the page. There is one definition that you don't need. You have five minutes to do this.
then there is rather a lot to check.
Task: Click here when you have decided what needs checking. |
You need to check:
- How people will be working (in pairs)
- How they can find the words (underlining)
- How many they need to find (7)
- Where the definitions are (at the bottom)
- What to do with the extra definition (ignore it)
- How long they have (5 minutes)
Task: Now, what would your questions be? Remember, you have to ask questions which will alert the learners to the important things and tell you that they have understood the task. Click here when you have thought of the questions. |
Here are some suggestions:
- Will you be working alone, in pairs or in a group?
- Which words are you looking for?
- How many are there?
- Where are the definitions?
- How many definitions are there?
- Why are there 8 definitions and only 7 words?
- How long do you have?
That's quite a lot to remember and quite a lot to ask so we have simple Rule #2:
- Write out the questions when you plan the lesson
- Make sure you distribute the questions fairly
You can, of course, break down the instruction and ask questions as you go along. Like this:
YOU: | OK. In this text there
are 7 underlined words. John, which is the first one? |
JOHN | Albatross |
YOU: | Right. Now look at the
bottom of the page. What do you see? Mary? |
MARY: | There are some, err, meanings. |
YOU: | Right. There are some
definitions. How many are there, Mary? |
MARY: | Eight. |
YOU: | Yes. What are they? |
MARY: | Definitions. |
YOU: | Right. Good. Now, I
want you to work in pairs to match the underlined words
to the definitions. There is one definition that you do not need. Peter. Who are you working with? |
PETER: | I'm working with Mary. |
YOU: | Fine. What do you do with the definitions? |
PETER: | Match them to the words. |
YOU: | OK. But there are eight
definition and only seven words. Patrick? |
PATRICK: | We don't need one of them. |
YOU: | Right. Now you have FIVE
minutes only. Please start now. |
The last instruction, of course, doesn't need checking
because it's very simple.
Notice, too, that Mary understands what a definition is (meaning)
but she didn't have the word to hand, until now.
The teacher wisely does not interrupt the checking routine to
dwell on the definition of definition.
Task: Finally, write down your instruction-checking questions for this instruction: Read the story and match the pictures to what happened so the pictures are in the same order as the text. Do this in pairs and then compare what you have to the pair on your right. Click here when you have thought of the questions. |
Here are some possible questions. They won't be exactly the same as yours but that doesn't matter too much.
- What do you do with the pictures?
(Put them in the right order) - What is the order?
(As it says in the text) - Are you working alone or in a pair?
(In a pair with ...) - What do you do when you have finished?
(Compare our answers with XXXX and YYYY)
It goes without saying that simple rule #3 is
The clearer and better expressed your instructions are in the first place, the less time it takes do check they have been understood.
A rider to that is, however, that no matter how clear you think you have been, your instructions still need to be checked.
Concept-checking questions |
Concept-checking questions are more difficult to construct and need a little more thought than simple instruction-checking questions.
Why? |
Concept-checking questions are important for three reasons:
- Because they are efficient and targeted. In day-to-day
life, we often ask if someone has understood and expect to get a
clear answer but classrooms are slightly different. Simple
asking something like:
Do you understand?
won't work well for two reasons:- The learner may honestly believe she has understood and answer Yes when, in fact, she has not really grasped the point at all
- The learner may be reluctant for personal and/or cultural reasons publicly to admit ignorance or lack of understanding. This is a face-saving issue.
- Concept-checking questions are infinitely reusable because,
once formed, they can be used every time your encounter the same
concept to check. For example, if you want to check
whether a learner has understood:
She is going to be here later
you can ask something like:
Is she here now?
When is she coming?
Is the speaker sure she is coming?
and those questions will work for a range of other sentences (although they'll need a little amendment) such as:
Mary is going to have a holiday in France
I am going to see my mother
I think it's going to rain
and so on. - Designing concept-checking questions requires that you, the teacher, fully understands the concept you are teaching and that means being clear in your own head what the form actually means in English. As soon as you try to construct a concept-checking question it will be instantly clear to you whether you have understood what you are teaching or not.
How? |
This is how you construct good concept-checking questions.
It's a two-stage process.
Understand the concept you are teaching |
This should go without saying but unless you have a very good
understanding of the concept that lies behind the language or skill
that you are teaching, you can't help others to understand it at
all. Worse, you may end up giving people the wrong idea about
something and that, in a teacher, is unforgiveable.
Here are some examples of what is meant.
Tense forms |
No two languages are completely parallel in terms of how they
conceptualise and chop up time and how speakers encode their view of
time and the events that happen in it.
Some languages are quite close to English, but some are very
different indeed.
In teaching terms, then, tense forms require very careful and
continual concept checking.
There is a guide on this site to using time lines, linked below, to
which you should refer for advice about presenting
the concepts.
Here, however, we are concerned with how you
check whether the presentation has been successful.
For example, you are concerned to make the conceptual difference
between:
I will be on holiday in France in June this
year
and
I am going to have a holiday in France in
June this year
because you know that learners often use the will form
because they think of it as 'the future tense' in English (an
assumption, incidentally, which is quite correct), and do not use
going to to refer to present intentions concerning the
future.
The first thing you need to get clear, then is the fact that the
going to structure refers to the present because it is about an
intention the speaker has NOW but the will form refers to
the future because it refers only to events which lie there.
You have put both the example sentences on the board (or projected
them).
Task: Think for a moment how you would form questions to make this concepts clear. Click here when you have thought of the questions. |
You
could try:
Is the speaker talking
about his plan NOW or is he talking about the future?
Which of the following comes next?
So, I'm afraid I can't come to her
wedding
I'm looking forward to practising my
schoolgirl French
Is what you have also clear in making the going to expression refer
to a present plan, not a future event?
If it is, that's OK.
Here's another example:
Task: You want to make it clear why. John had come home and went to bed is wrong but: John had felt ill all day so he went to bed is correct. Click here when you have thought of the questions. |
The distinction is
between immediate actions happening almost at once which are not
related causally and actions which happen as a result of previous
actions or states.
Good questions to ask are:
In sentence
1: Why did he go to bed?
(Answer: We don't know.)
Which happened first, coming home or going to bed?
(Answer: coming home, obviously.)
Do we need the grammar to make this clear?
(Answer: No, so no past perfect form.)
In sentences 2: Why did he go to bed?
(Answer: because he felt ill)
Is event 2 the result of event 1?
(Answer: Yes, so we need a past perfect tense form.)
Modality |
Another area of the language in which concepts are often very
difficult to grasp for learners is modality and the use of and
meaning of modal auxiliary verbs.
There are also many guides in the section in the in-service area of
the site that cover the concepts and realisations of modality.
That area, too, is linked below and will help you to plan your
teaching of modality concepts.
You are concerned to establish the difference between these two
example sentences:
John could have been there
and
John couldn't have been there
This seems simple but it isn't because:
- When we use the verb could in the past it
refers to possibility (i.e., the speaker's understanding of
the likelihood of something being true).
When we use the verb in the present, however, it often refers to ability. So, for example:
I could swim well when I was a child
refers to ability only, but:
I could ask a question
means either that:
I was able / allowed to ask a question
or
I may ask a question in the future
Here, we are concerned with the past-tense use. - The expression couldn't have is not just the
negative of could have because it implies a very
different level of likelihood.
John could have been there
implies that the speaker is not at all sure whether John was there or not. It is low-level certainty, therefore. However,
John couldn't have been there
strongly implies that the speaker is quite sure that John was not there (because it seems impossible). In other words, it is the opposite of
John must have been there. - Even in the past form, there is some ambiguity so, for
example:
John could have left his car at my house
means either:
I am not sure whether John left his car at my house or not
which expresses my doubt about the truth of something, or
I offered to let John leave his car at my house but he didn't
which is not to do with my perception of the truth of something but to giving someone permission to do something.
Task: You have put the two example sentences above on the board. What concept-check questions would you ask to make the difference clear? Click here when you have thought of the questions. |
Here are some possibilities. Providing you have covered the
same ground, it doesn't matter if you don't have the same wording.
When we say
John could have been there
are we talking about what John is able to do or where we
think John was?
(Answer: What we think happened)
When we say
John
couldn't have been there
are we saying
John was not able to be there
or
I am sure John was not there?
(Answer: I am sure John was not there)
When we say
John
could have been there
how sure are we? 50-50? 100% sure? 90%
sure?
(Answer: 50-50 (or less))
When we say
John
couldn't have been there
how sure are we that he was not there? 50-50?
100% sure? 90% sure?
(Answer: 100% or 90% (better))
Which the opposite of
John
couldn't have been there
John must have been there
or
John could have been there
(Answer: John must have been there)
This is a difficult and non-intuitive concept to grasp so lots of checking
questions, which should be repeated at some point, are helpful.
Skills |
We are going to take reading skills as our example but the same
consideration would also apply to listening skills because they are
both receptive skills.
Here, we are not concerned with the concepts which lie behind
structures but with the explicit understanding of what the skills
involve in English.
As our example we will take this instruction:
Read through John's biography quickly and find out:
When John was born
Where he was born
How old was he when he left school
When he died
You only have four minutes to do this.
Task: Decide what sort of reading this task demands. When you have written your concept-checking questions, click here. |
This task is all about scanning: looking through a text for
specific data only.
Questions could be something like:
Do you have
to read every word?
(Answer: No.)
Why not?
(Answer: because I only want to know four things.)
Where will you look first?
(Answer: The beginning because in a biography, the birth
information usually comes first.)
What sort of information are you looking for for the second
question?
(Answer: a place so it will begin with a capital letter.)
What sort of information do you need for the first and last
questions?
(Answer: dates.)
What sort of information do you need for the third question?
(Answer: a number.)
Good. You have four minutes. Go.
The last instruction doesn't need checking because now it's very
simple.
All the instructions are directed at getting people to scan rather
than read intensively or just skim for the gist.
Focus |
Many words and some structures have more than one meaning or
communicative function and it's important to focus concept-checking
questions on the context and function you want your learners to
grasp.
That means editing what you know down to what is manageable.
Here's an example, using five lexemes as part of the targets for
a lesson.
They are:
nurse (n. and
vb.)
specialist (n.)
operate (vb.)
operation (n.)
recover( vb.)
All the words appear in a text about someone's recent experience of
being very ill and the general meaning is probably clear from
context and co-text.
Task: Think for a moment about what it is important to know about these words and how you would focus your learners on the meanings and word grammar you want them to grasp using concept-checking questions (rather than just telling people things). Click here when you have thought of the questions. |
Here are some ideas for how to elicit and check understanding of lexis.
- The word nurse is both a noun and, by what is
called conversion, can be used as a verb. So:
What does a nurse wear at work?
Can you use the word for men and women?
The word is a noun in the first paragraph but what is it doing in:
They nursed me really carefully
Who can nurse someone?
Can a car nurse someone?
Can you nurse a plant?
Can I say:
She nursed in 1960?
Why not? - The word specialist is a noun for people only even
though other things can be specialised. The suffix -ist
is used mostly for what people do, people's political views or
the instruments that people play. The suffix does not
usually affect the stressed syllable.
In the text, what sort of specialist is the man talking about?
What is his specialism?
Where is the stress on the word?
Where is the stress on special?
What about these words? Where is the stress on: bicycle / bicyclist, monarch / monarchist, feminine / feminist, material / materialist, traditional / traditionalist?
I have a special cat. Is my cat a specialist? - The word operate is a verb but it is intransitive
(unlike nurse which is always transitive). It has
a dependent preposition, on. We are not concerned
here with the word's general meaning (function) but
with its meaning in this context (perform surgery).
We do, however, need to focus the learners on the word grammar
and pronunciation.
Can I say
He operated me?
What do I say?
What's the preposition?
Where is the stress?
What is the noun from this verb?
Where is the stress on the noun?
What about these. Where is the stress on: identify / identification, hospitalize / hospitalization, specify / specification? - The word recover is a verb but it is intransitive. It
has the dependent proposition from.
Can I say
He recovered the illness?
What do I say?
What's the preposition?
Is the verb recover more like the verb operate or the verb nurse? Think about the object and the preposition.
You see how it works. The focus is maintained on the words
as they are used in the text and the attempt is to extend the learners' knowledge and
allow them to make associations with other words they know and, we
hope, see the patterns.
In the trade, we are encouraging noticing.
There's a guide to that, linked below.
It comes with practice |
Using good checking questions is not as difficult as learning to
play the cello but, like that skill, it comes with practice and gets
easier.
If you are at the beginning of your career, then you would be well
advised to write out your check questions with your lesson plan.
The plus side to that is that you can refine them based on the
experience of using them and then use them again and again for the
same or similar concepts.
Pretty soon, concept- and instruction-checking questions become
second nature and you'll wonder what the fuss was about.
There's no test on this because you did enough of those as we went along, didn't you?
Related guides | |
using time lines | the essential guide to how to use these to make the concepts of tense forms clear |
the modality index | this link takes you to the in-service section that deals with concepts of modality |
asking good questions | this is a more general guide to asking good questions in the classroom. It is not as easy as you may think |
checking learning | for a related guide to making sure what you teach is what is learned |
noticing | for the in-service guide to a key teaching idea |
Bloom's taxonomy | this is a way of looking at questions and tasks to measure how difficult they are in terms of cognitive challenge |