Place adjunct adverbials
Here, we are considering how English refers to where or
to where.
In many grammars (especially those written for learners) a
distinction is made, rightly, between adverbs and prepositional
phrases. For example:
- He looked upwards
- He looked to the sky
In the first sentence, we have a place adverb, upwards,
and in the second we have a prepositional phrase of place, to
the sky. However, both the prepositional phrase and the adverb
modify how we see the verb look so they both function as
adverbials and, to be more precise, as adjuncts, integral to the
clause but omissible because they add extra information.
For this reason, this guide will cover all place adverbials, and not
distinguish except in passing between adverbs proper, such as
here, there, northwards, aboard etc.
and prepositional phrases such as
in my house, at my desk, to the office, to the south, on
the boat etc.
Hence the title.
We are only considering
adverbial adjuncts in what follows, i.e., adjuncts which modify verb
phrases. Adjuncts can also modify, for
example, noun phrases as in:
The argument after dinner was soon settled
in which the adjunct, after dinner, modifies the noun phrase
the argument
She was very happy
in which the adjunct very modifies the adjective happy
He drove too quickly
in which the adjunct too modifies the adverb quickly.
The technical terms for these sorts of adjuncts are, respectively,
adnomial, adadjectival and adadverbial but those are not terms which
should delay you or your learners.
Open and closed word classes |
Prepositions are traditionally referred to as members of a closed class of
words because it is, in theory, possible to make a complete and
exhaustive list of all the prepositions in a language. In
English, a full list would be over 200 items long. If you
would like a list of 200-odd prepositions, there is one
here.
Adverbs on the other hand, are an open class of words because it is
possible, in theory, to create an unlimited number of new ones.
These may not appear in a dictionary (by definition) but few people
would have a problem identifying the new adverb in
He staggered home unsoberly.
Any attempt to provide an exhaustive list of adverbs is, therefore,
doomed.
However, when we consider adjuncts of place, the situation is
reversed. Prepositional phrases, rather than prepositions, because they consist of the
preposition plus its complement (usually a noun) form an open class because the number of nouns which can act as complements of
prepositions is, in theory at least, unlimited. Nouns are
members of an open class and new ones are continually created.
Prepositions which function within place adjuncts form, however, a closed class so in theory again,
they can be listed and the list may be exhaustive.
Here's a short list of 90-odd of the most common, and probably the
only ones you might consider teaching:
aboard, about, above, abroad, across, after, ahead, along, alongside, anywhere, around, ashore, aside, astern, away, back, before, behind, below, beneath, between, beyond, by, down, downhill, downriver, downstairs, downstream, downward(s), east, eastwards, elsewhere, everywhere, far, forward, here, hereabouts, home, in, indoors, inland, inshore, inside, inward(s), left, locally, near, nearby, north, northwards, nowhere, off, offshore, on, opposite, out, outdoors, outside, outward(s), over, overboard, overhead, overland, overseas, past, right, round, sideways, skyward, somewhere, south, southwards, there, through, throughout, under, underfoot, underground, underneath, up, uphill, upriver, upstairs, upstream, upward(s), west, west, westwards, within
If you would like that list as a PDF document,
click here. That list is long enough but doesn't include
some specialised nautical terms such as starboard, larboard
and aft or some uncommon adverbs such as
moonwards, sunwards and so on. The suffix -wards
can be used with almost any noun representing a place or destination
so new formulations such as Londonwards, are always possible.
There are probably other omissions, too.
(One other small note is that American English usage generally
favours -ward rather than the British English -wards.)
Here, we are discussing these words in their costume of adverbials.
Many of them can slide across word classes so, for example, we can
have
An upstairs room
(adjective)
A voice from the
beyond (noun)
Home is where the heart
is (noun)
A north wind
(adjective)
Somewhere
interesting (determiner)
An offshore breeze
(adjective)
It's cold in the north
(noun)
and so on.
The most important word-class change for our purposes is that many of these adverbs are also prepositions in other circumstances. Common ones are: around, behind, down, in, off, on, over, so we can have the words used in both ways:
Adverb use | Preposition use |
He came around | They walked around the town |
She fell behind | The hid behind the curtain |
The building fell down | They walked down the road |
Are you going in? | I left it in my bedroom |
The bracket fell off | They pulled it off the wall |
I drove on | Put it on the table |
He knocked the glass over | I poured water over her |
It will not have escaped everyone's notice that the fact that
some prepositions also function as adverbs explains much about
phrasal verb use. For example, using up as a
preposition in something straightforward such as:
I passed the book up to him
leads quite naturally to unpacking the meaning of the adverb
particle in
I brought the subject of money up
Many other ostensibly opaque meanings of particles in phrasal verbs
can be explained by reference to what the word means when it is used
as a preposition and employing a little imagination to see how the
meaning is extended, but not fundamentally altered, when it is an
adverb.
Adjunct or adverbial
|
We should pause for a moment to consider another slightly technical distinction: the difference between an obligatory adverbial and an adverbial adjunct. Both are adverbials but they differ in how they are used.
- By definition (adjunct
means a non-essential
extra), adjuncts provide optional data and removing them
does not affect the central meaning of the clause.
For example:
He ran to the door
He ran off
contain the prepositional phrase adjunct, to the door or the adverb adjunct off, but the clause can stand alone and still maintain its meaning as
He ran - However, in:
I put my laptop on my desk
I put my laptop away
we have a non-adjunct adverbial phrase, on my desk and the non-adjunct adverb away, and we cannot omit either and leave a comprehensible clause:
*I put my laptop
What we are dealing with here is a semantic rather than
grammatical distinction because some verbs in some of their senses
require adverbial
complementation. These verbs are often called PP
complement transitive verbs because they are always transitive and
require a prepositional phrase or other adverbial complement. The verbs are usually those referring to
causing something to be somewhere and they include:
keep, lay, place, plonk, position,
put, rest, set, site, situate, stick, stuff.
There is also one verb, venture,
which requires an adverbial complement so we allow, e.g.:
She ventured into the cave
but not:
*She ventured.
In none of these cases can we have a well-formed sentence which lacks
a place adverbial although the polysemous nature of some of them
makes it possible in certain senses. For example, we cannot
have:
*John laid the book
*I placed the vase
*I stuck the suitcase
*She put the car
*She plonked herself
*The woman rested her head
*They set the chair
and so on although, of course, the following with other senses of
the verb are possible:
The chicken laid an egg
I placed my bet
I rested my case
Mary set the clock
We ventured a question
and so on.
The verb stay can be included when it means live
temporarily so
I stayed in a hotel
is possible but, in the same sense of the verb,
*I stayed
is not.
When stay simply means remain, it requires no
complementing adverbial so
John left but I stayed
is acceptable.
Position and destination |
If you have followed the guide to prepositional phrases, linked in the list of related guides at the end, you
will know that one essential distinction is between those that refer
to direction and those that refer to place. For example, the
prepositions into, onto, past can only refer to movement to
a destination. We allow, therefore:
Put it into the box
I nailed it onto the wall
I ran past the shop
but not:
*It is into the box
*It's onto the wall
*I stood past the shop
(There are times when past refers to a place as in,
e.g.:
The bank is past the next junction
but, even here, there is a sense of direction because it is
implicitly necessary to go past
the junction to arrive at the
bank.)
In one of these cases, we are dealing with an adverbial which is not
an adjunct because omitting it leaves a malformed clause as we saw
above.
We can have:
I nailed it
and
I ran
but not
*I put.
So it is with omissible adverb adjuncts:
after, along, aside, before, by, downward(s), forward,
inward(s), left, outward(s), over, past, right, round, sideways,
skyward, upward(s) refer solely to direction and not to place
so we can allow, e.g.:
I stood aside
The car slid sideways
I sauntered past
etc.
but not:
*I remained aside
*I was sideways
*I stayed past
The first major distinction is, then, between place adjuncts of
position and place adjuncts of destination.
Because these distinctions are specific to English in terms of which
words act in which ways, much error can arise unless the teaching
focuses on this fundamental use distinction. If your learners
are making mistakes such as:
*I was sideways
*The house lay past
*He sat left
then a failure to distinguish in teaching and presenting the forms
is probably the cause.
Stative and dynamic verb use |
There are two basic rules:
- Direction adjuncts cannot be used with any verbs which do not refer to motion or direction.
- Position adjuncts can be used with all verbs whether the use is dynamic, stative or copular.
Exemplification will help a little.
- Directional adjuncts with verbs of motion or direction:
- We allow the use with these sorts
of verbs:
- Turn right here
- I pushed it forwards
- She shot round the corner
- I drove past your house
- Step aside, please
- but we do not allow the use with
stative verb uses or copular verbs:
- *It stayed forwards
- *It is right (where on the right is intended)
- *I remained past
- *It seemed along
- We allow the use with these sorts
of verbs:
- Positional adjuncts with all kinds of verbs, including the
copular verb be:
- We allow:
- It seems warmer ashore
- I have it here
- He stayed home
- He went home
- The party will be upstairs
- The party is happening upstairs
- The house lies round the corner
- but we do not, of course, allow progressive forms with
copular verbs:
- *The party is being upstairs
- *It is appearing colder in the north
- We allow:
Exceptionally, some adjuncts which are only directional can be
used with a copular verb but the meaning is that the state or
direction of movement has been or will be achieved so they are
really stative uses. For example:
The deadline will be past by the time you
finish
She will be along in a minute
The story so far.
Here's a summary of the distinctions we have made with some simple
examples.
Ordering adjuncts |
Here, again, there are two rules (of thumb):
- Put the reference to smaller places first, so prefer:
He works in a restaurant in London
to
He works in London in a restaurant
and
She went to a party in a house in Margate
to
She went to a party in Margate in a house - Direction adjuncts are conceptually closer to the verb than
position adjuncts. So, put the direction adjunct first and
the position adjunct second, and prefer:
He went upstairs to his room
to
He went to his room upstairs (where upstairs can be interpreted as a postpositioned adjective)
and
They dropped me off near my office
to
*They dropped me near my office off - Additionally, prepositional phrase adjuncts usually come
after adverb adjuncts so we get, e.g.:
They walked down to the pub
not *They walked to the pub down
She drove westwards to the mountains
not *She drove to the mountains westwards
Students can eat here in the canteen
not Students can eat in the canteen here (in which the word here modifies the canteen, not the verb)
She went home to her father's house
not *She went to her father's house home
To avoid the consequences of emphasising the position adjunct by
placing it near the end of the clause (a phenomenon known as end
focus), it can be placed in the initial position, for example:
In Britain, people change to a new job every
8 years on average
rather than
People change to a new job every 8 years on average in
Britain (which over-emphasises the position adjunct).
Place prepositional phrases are routinely put in the initial
position so we can have either
In the drawer I found my new socks
or
I found my new socks in the drawer
with very little change in meaning although fronting the
prepositional phrase lends it a degree of markedness.
There are discourse constraints operating however in longer texts
because the fronted position for the adjunct implies that it is
marked in some way. So, for example, we would normally prefer:
I looked everywhere for my car keys, even in the fridge,
and in the fridge I found them.
to
I looked everywhere for my car keys, even in the fridge,
and I found them in the fridge.
Place adjuncts appear in the initial position frequently, but there are restrictions:
- Both position and direction adjuncts prefer the final
position so the more natural form is:
It was raining hard outside
rather than
Outside it was raining hard
and
He was sitting quietly in the garden
rather than
In the garden he was sitting quietly
because the fronted position emphasises (marks) the adjunct. - The adverbs here and there are, however, often
fronted, even in informal speech and especially with pronouns:
Here she is at last
There he goes
with nouns, too, the initial position is common but the subject and verb must be reversed:
Here comes Mary
Here is your newspaper
There goes the neighbourhood
There's his sister
This inversion does not happen when the subject is a pronoun:
Here he is
not
*Here is he
(Inversion also does not happen with time adjuncts
Then John arrived
not
*Then arrived John) - When the subject of the verb is a noun (rather than a
pronoun), the subject and verb are reversed,
without, as is often the
case with inversion, employing the do operator.
For example:
Into the house marched the police
In the kitchen stood her sister
Out went the lights
Over went all the glasses
Below the village lies a wonderful restaurant
etc.
Often, with this kind of inversion, we need the do or did operator with present simple and past simple forms so we get, for example:
Never did I hear of such stupidity
Rarely do we meet nowadays
etc.
However, with these place adverbials no such use is required, so:
*Into the house did the police march
*Below the village does lie a wonderful restaurant
are disallowed.
Fronting adverbials like this is often done for literary effect and the final position is by far the safest place for learners to place the adjunct.
The kind of fronting mentioned in b. and c. above with the inversion of subject and object is limited to a few verbs expressing relational processes such as stand, lie, and be and to an equally limited number of dynamic behavioural processes such as come, march, walk, go, fall etc.
Positional adjuncts can occupy a middle position in a clause but
it is somewhat rarer. For example:
He is here enjoying the sunshine
The weather is everywhere in the country awful this week
She is in the garden pulling up weeds
Directional adjuncts can't take this position at all so
*He is upstairs moving it
*She is into the garden taking it
are not possible and the preferred form is to place the adjunct
after the object:
He is moving it upstairs
She is taking it into the garden
Negation with adjuncts |
Directional adjuncts
We can front direction adjuncts in declarative clauses so we can
have, e.g.:
Through the village and across the churchyard
he came to my house
and that can also be:
He came to my house through the village and
across the churchyard
However, if we try to negate the first sentence we get the
unacceptable
*Through the village and across the churchyard he didn't
come to my house
but the second produces
He didn't come to my house through the
village and across the churchyard
which is fine.
Fronted adjuncts cannot generally occur in negated clauses.
Position adjuncts
Position adjuncts are much more obliging and can be fronted in
declarative and negated clauses so both these are acceptable:
In this town there aren't any good pubs
Outside nobody is smoking
but with these, too, the final position is more natural:
There aren't any good pubs in this town
Nobody is smoking outside
unless the speaker wishes to emphasise the location.
Modifying adjuncts |
We can heighten the effect of both adverb and
prepositional-phrase place adjuncts but the range of intensifiers is quite
limited (and easy to teach). For example:
They are going
further inland
It lies far beyond the city
They sailed due west,
directly into the sunset
He kicked it clean over the
wall
He went a good deal further
up
She turned sharp left
He went right over the fence
He fell a long way down
As you can see, the intensifiers are pretty much limited to far
/ further, clean, right, due, directly, sharp, a long way.
That's teachable in a single lesson and provides learners with a
natural and useful set of intensified chunks of language.
Imperatives with place adjuncts |
In children's stories and, sometimes for comic effect, direction
adjuncts are often placed in the initial position, for example:
Through the woods they tramped
Over the hill they scrambled
and so on.
Outside of children's stories, and in informal speech, the verbs
come, go and get are sometimes used in imperatives in
the same way, usually with adverbs rather than prepositional
phrases. For example:
Out you go
On you get
Off you go
Over you come
Again informally, some directional adverbs can be used as
imperatives with no
verb at all. They include:
Out!
Back
Down!
Off!
etc.
Good dog.
Time and place together |
Frequently, time adjuncts and place adjuncts co-occur in the same
clause.
In English, there are no absolute rules for ordering time and place
(as there are in many languages). There are, however, rules of
thumb:
- We place longer adjuncts after shorter ones so we prefer:
He was working here for many years
rather than
*He was working for many years here
and
He was working in 1990 at a prestigious and expensive Chinese restaurant in New York
rather than
He was working at a prestigious and expensive Chinese restaurant in New York in 1990 - When all the adjuncts come at the end of the clause, as is
frequently the case, the usual order is place then time, because
place is usually more closely linked to the verb than the time.
So, we
prefer:
He worked at a restaurant in London for three years in the mid-70s
rather than
He worked for three years in London, in the mid-70s at a restaurant
or any other possible combination of the four adjuncts. - When the first two rules conflict and to avoid stylistic
problems, the time adjunct is often placed in initial position
so the last example might be better as:
In the mid-70s, he worked at a restaurant in London for three years
or
For three years in the mid-70s, he worked at a restaurant in London
For special emphasis or to give one adjunct or another extra
weight, speakers will flout these rules so we might get:
At that time, of course, in
London it was difficult to get a decent cup of coffee anywhere.
Related guides | |
prepositions of time | for a guide to this set of prepositions |
prepositions of place | for a guide to this set of prepositions |
time adjuncts | for a parallel guide to these |
prepositional phrases | for a guide to prepositions and their complements |
7 meanings of over | for a short video presentation of the meanings of a troublesome preposition |
adverbials | for a guide to distinguishing adjuncts from disjuncts from conjuncts |
adverbs | for a general guide to adverbs |
multi-word verbs | for the differences between prepositional, phrasal and phrasal-prepositional verbs |
References:
Chalker, S, 1984, Current English Grammar, London:
Macmillan
Quirk, R, Greenbaum, S, Leech, G & Svartvik, J, 1972, A Grammar of
Contemporary English,
Harlow: Longman