Modality in Business English
There are, of course, many guides on this site concerned with
modality, modal auxiliary verbs, mood and expressing doubt,
certainty and so on. All tackle modality in one way or
another.
The index to modality guides is
here
(new tab).
This short guide is not concerned to analyse the many ways in which
English handles modality but to see what types of modality and what
language forms are most centrally needed by learners and users of
English in a business context.
Before we can get on to that, here's a reminder of the main sorts of
modality we need to think about and some examples of how we might
express the ideas in a Business English context.
- epistemic modality is to do with the
speaker's perception of the truth or otherwise of a
proposition. There are three sorts:
- judgemental or speculative
These figures might not be entirely accurate
It is possible that there will be a short delay - deductive or evidential
The material may have been exposed to damp
It seems that our meeting was not successful - assumptive
The office won't be open for another hour or so
The time difference means we must talk in the evening
- judgemental or speculative
- deontic modality relates to obligation and
duty (or its lack). There are four sorts:
- imperative
This must be finished by Thursday
We cannot commit too many resources to the project - directive
Please make sure the room is arranged for the meeting
It's your responsibility to update the figures - commissive
Please be assured of our closest attention to this
Your order will be filled this month - jussive
The finance manager has the duty to get the figures to you
My colleagues will get back to you very soon
- imperative
- dynamic modality is centred on the subject
and encompasses ability and willingness.
- ability
We could fulfil the order more quickly with some changes to the production schedule
We have the means to re-design the product - willingness
The report will be with you by Thursday
We are committed to serving our customers' best interests
This type of modality is, elsewhere on this site, described as commissive modality because it functions to commit the speaker / writer to an action.
- ability
A fourth type of modality, alethic modality,
referring to logical necessity, is little used in Business English
(which is more concerned with the preceding three types of modality)
although its use in English for Science and Technology to refer to
natural laws is very common. For example:
The materials must be heated to 600
degrees Celsius to extract the product
refers not to the speaker's perception and not to any form
of obligation, ability or deduction but to the fact that one of the
necessary conditions of extracting the product is the heating.
Formality |
The usual, regrettably sometimes the only, way that modality is
tackled in the General English classroom is via the use of
modal auxiliary verbs with the often confusing and vague focus on
possibility, obligation, likelihood, ability, willingness and so on.
In Business English, however, the level of formality and distancing
that is needed often precludes the use of modal auxiliary verbs
altogether and even more often prohibits the use of personal
pronouns.
The alternative resource is to employ modal adjectives, verbs, nouns
and adverbs which allow the speaker / writer to maintain a certain
impersonal distance and to focus on the issue rather than people's
views of the issue.
Instead of ... | ... we are more likely to have ... |
Epistemic modality | |
He might complain about that | It is not impossible that the customer will complain |
This must be what we should do | This is clearly the right way to proceed |
There is going to be a problem | A problem is unavoidable |
That has to be the problem | That is evidently the source of the problem |
The materials should be with you soon | You have our assurance that the materials will be with you soon |
It might be doable in the time allowed | Hypothetically, this can be achieved in the time allowed |
Deontic modality | |
You must write the report soon | The report needs to be written soon |
We have to get this finished | There's an obligation to complete this |
We can't do it like that | There is little point in proceeding this way |
We must obey the regulations | This will be done in conformity with the regulations |
I don't have to be at the meeting | It is not necessary for me to attend |
She must go to talk to the customer | Please ask her to talk to the customer personally |
You carry the can | The liability for any issues lies with you |
Dynamic modality | |
I'll make sure this happens | This will be achieved |
We can see from the data that ... | The data demonstrate that ... |
We couldn't do it in time | Time was too limited for the accomplishment of the actions |
We won't reduce the price | The price is not negotiable |
The department could see that it failed | It became obvious to the department that there was no success |
We can meet the demands of the programme | The programme can be accomplished |
Note also in the list above the frequent use of passive
structures which allow an impersonal rather than a personal tone.
For a fuller list of modal adjectives, nouns, verbs and adverbs, see
the guide to modality without modal auxiliary verbs, linked below.
Hedging and epistemic modality |
Apart from issues of formality, modal expressions are concerned
with hedging responses because in business it is often a mistake to
appear too certain or make promises one cannot keep. The
ability to hedge, in both writing and speech, is an important one.
In informal, everyday language expressions such as:
I might do
That could be
Probably, ...
Perhaps, ...
Actually, ...
I believe ...
and so are commonly used to hedge the certainty of what one says.
As we saw above, however, in Business English, the preference is to
avoid simple modal auxiliary verbs and informal adverbials and use
rather more sophisticated language.
Here are some examples:
Instead of ... | ... we are more likely to have ... |
She might be at the meeting | It is possible that she will be at the meeting |
That must be the case | This is almost certainly the situation |
This should fix the problem | This is a plausible solution |
They can't have decided yet | The decision has arguably not been made |
Business should pick up in the winter | Statistically, business improves in the winter months |
That must have been the cause | That is verifiably the cause |
That ought to be better | The team assumes that this is an improvement |
and so on. Again the use of adverbs, adjectives, nouns and verbs is a preferred route to expressing certainty and likelihood.
Teaching |
The natural temptation to teach modality from the point of view
of what modal auxiliary verbs can signal should be resisted. A
functional approach, looking at the three main types of modality
that are useful in a business context is probably a better way
forward.
Better still is getting well away from the use of modal auxiliary
verbs, especially for epistemic and deontic modality, altogether and
focusing on adverbs, verbs, adjectives and nouns which perform the
same functions but are more easily adapted to change the tone of
what is said from the personal to the distant.
Raising awareness |
The modal auxiliary verb system in English is a complex and
confusing area and learners who have mastered most or even only part
of it are naturally keen to deploy their knowledge of the verbs.
However, within formal language in a business context, that often
results in some inappropriate and often far too direct language.
This needs addressing first so a way to begin is to see if people
can identify what is polite, formal and distant from what is clear
but too direct and personal.
A simple matching task such as this one
is all that is needed and the task can be extended to make more
subtle differences clear, of course, depending on the level of the
learners.
Language focus |
The key here is the use of verbs, nouns, adverbs and adjectives
to express modality in ways that are less direct, personal or
threatening.
Here's an example of the sort of exercise type one could use.
What differences are there? How have things been changed? The first one is an example. | ||
This ... | ... was changed to this ... | ... by ... |
They might have what we need | It is conceivable that they are able to supply what is required | Using an adjective (conceivable)
instead of the verb might Changing the verbs to something more exact (have to supply, need to require) |
These figures should go in the report | The report will be improved with the inclusion of these figures | |
Why can't we make the data more secure? | What is the reason that we are unable to secure the data? |
and so on.
Language production |
A short step from the language focus phase is to semi-controlled production:
Rephrase the sentences to make them more business-like, impersonal and formal. The first one is an example. | |
Original | Rephrasing |
I suppose this could be the solution | It is conceivable that this is a solution |
Make sure this gets done | |
Can we try another way? | |
We can't go on like this | |
Production must be increased | |
Would you get the figures to the bank, please? |
There will, naturally, be scope for discussing a range of alternatives. That can be helpful and make the language a little more personal.
Footnote |
None of the above should be taken to suggest that modal auxiliary
verbs are never used in Business English settings. That would
be absurd.
Many business-oriented interactions are informal, social and
confidence-/ rapport-building encounters in which all three types of
modality are commonly realised through the use of modal and
semi-modal auxiliary verbs. There are guides to all of these
linked from the in-service index to modality.
However, the overuse of modal auxiliary verbs where more
sophisticated language would be appropriate is certainly a marker of
someone not at home with how to use distancing, hedging and
depersonalisation techniques.
Related guides | |
the modality index | for the in-service index to the whole area |
modality without modal auxiliary verbs | a guide to alternatives which may be more appropriate in more formal settings |
types of modality | an overview of deontic, epistemic, alethic and dynamic modality |
epistemic modality | modality for expressing the speaker's view of the truth or a proposition, i.e., likelihood |
deontic modality | modality for expressing the speaker's view of obligation or its lack |
dynamic modality | modality for expressing ability and willingness |
modality and aspect | which consider modal auxiliary verbs with perfect and progressive forms and also considers some of the types of modality discussed here |
the passive in business English | for a guide to a related area also concerned with impersonal, more formal language |